This months’ watch material comes in three related parts. The first relates to the current state of our nations and the continent of which we are a part, the second to God and chaos, and the third addresses the feedback that we have received on nation states, Israel and the divine nature. So there is plenty to pray into and challenge our mindsets with and then relate to our daily life in the world!

 

1. THE STATE OF OUR NATION AND CONTINENT

 

A recent letter calling British Christian leaders to prayer begins:The United Kingdom is in great trouble. The economic problems have exposed the moral and spiritual bankruptcy of the nation. The foundations of our society are being shaken.” Although I recognise the need for united prayer and appreciate the sense of responsibility of friends and colleagues involved in this initiative, I find myself distinctly uneasy at the assumptions behind this call to prayer. While I agree with the conclusion that the foundations of the nation are being shaken, I regard that fact as the desired conclusion of three generations of revival, two decades of intercession and an extraordinary season of prophecy. The signs are that the UK might be getting OUT of trouble at last! And while I recognise many moral and spiritual failings in the nation, it seems premature to equate the economic problems with moral and spiritual bankruptcy. It may rather be that the exposure of the moral and spiritual bankruptcy of our western economic system is a sign of impending moral and spiritual revival. That God is pleased with the desire for justice and concern for the environment of many young sons and daughters of peace out there who haven’t yet discovered him personally. These alternative ways of viewing what is happening can be applied to our whole continent so let’s all take courage and think about praying along these lines.

 

2. GOD AND CHAOS

 

A few of us from France, Germany and the UK have just spent several  days in prayer, discussion and prophetic interpretation together in the ongoing attempt to understand and impact the times we are in. We found ourselves led to consider the relationship between God and chaos particularly in the light of the current economic shakings and recent scientific discoveries. We concluded the following: (i) God created out of chaos not out of nothing (Gen1:2). Chaos is not negative but the basic material of creation and life (Jn1:3). This is a helpful corrective to the weird idea promoted by Augustine that God must have created out of nothing and be entirely separate from his creation because it is in some way contaminating. (ii) Whenever something old needs to be completed and a resurrection needs to take place and bring about new creation, fullness, the kingdom of God, then shaking is necessary to precipitate the new, and this makes for a season of chaos (Heb12:26-27). (iii) The current shakings and chaos need to be embraced in faith in order for the kingdom to come. This faith is not passivity, but faithfulness to the love and mercy of the kingdom of God whatever happens.

 

3. RESPONSE TO THE FEEDBACK OF THE LAST MONTHS

 

Nation states, Israel and the divine nature. The full text of the feedback can be found on the blog at www.daywatch.eu

 

i) Nation states

 

It has been suggested that the nation state is a lot older than 500 years. I agree that the state, and particularly the city state, of course goes back to Plato and beyond and was the building block for empire, understood as the means of the domination of the many by the few and featured by the devil in his temptation of Jesus (Lk4:5-8, Mtt4:8-10).  My point is that the modern western nation state as the supposed vehicle for peace over a territory and its inhabitants is the child of Christendom (the word we use in English to describe the marriage of Church and empire). This nation state is a new sovereignty that has been established in the cause of peace, which the church has been dependent on and legitimated, but to which it has given away its responsibility and the future hope for this world. If this is correct then the nation state is in part a Christian construct, but definitely not a kingdom one. Like empire itself God can use it redemptively, but it can never be the primary means to the kingdom of God because the domination component is antichristian and in the end opposes the kingdom of God.

 

(ii) Israel

 

On the basis of a Christological hermeneutic, or put more simply if we interpret the whole of scripture through Jesus as its fulfilment, then we have to conclude that the nation of Israel was the primary agent of the kingdom of God before Jesus came, but is fulfilled in him. Neither he nor his church replaces Israel, but they both fulfil its responsibility as the primary agent of salvation. Israel is now the recipient of salvation together with the other nations, each having their own specific redemptive gift. However these national identities are distinct from the nation states that shackle them. The state is an empire based form of captivity that the kingdom of God has come to destroy. This includes the nation state of Israel, which ultimately works against the kingdom of God like all empire based constructs.

 

iii) The nature of Christ

 

I suggested in the first Daywatch guidelines that the words kenotic and kenosis are good words for describing the way of life in the kingdom of God. I based this on Paul’s use of the term in Philippians 2:7 to describe Jesus giving himself in love in contrast to the empty glory of seeking ones own way (Phil2:3). The question has been raised of the usefulness of ascribing the words ‘kenotic’ and ‘kenosis’ to Jesus’ way of life. I’ve no particular axe to grind about this, and take the point that some people might get a bit put off if they Google or otherwise explore terms that some people have used to suggest that Jesus somehow ceased to be God when he emptied himself. The same contributor has suggested that we build up a glossary of such terms on the blog so that people will know how we are using them. While this could be a good idea, it has the tendency to suggest that we are trying to arrive at certainty here, rather than risk a chaotic season. I prefer the latter at this point. To clarify, when following the Christ of the gospels we encounter one who pours his love and power out for others, rather than holding on to it for himself. I suggest that far from this suggesting that he is less than God, it suggests that this is what God does too.

 

Blessings,

Roger and Team

 

PS The team is NOT just me, and now that I have got things started you can expect to hear more from the others!